Water treatment by micro- or ultrafiltration, or reverse osmosis is applied to a range of purposes, including recycling wastewater or reducing contamination sufficiently to make it safe for discharge to the environment. The problem is that membranes age, foul, are blocked by compounds in the feedwater and stop working. Ceramic membranes last longer and are more resistant to cleaning and defouling processes than other types of membranes. This research used a 25m2 ceramic microfiltration membrane pilot plant installed downstream of an ozone disinfection process to examine the effect of the integrated combination of these two units on turbid (3-5 NTU), highly fouling secondary effluent from a wastewater treatment plant. Adding coagulation with ‘PAC’ to the process stream more than doubled (flux) flows through the membrane. The pathogen indicators E. coli and MS2 were used to calculate Log Removal Values of >3.2 and 4 for protozoans and viruses respectively. It was concluded that the hybrid ozone-PAC – ceramic membrane treatment process was highly effective for treating and recycling challenging wastewaters.

Wastewater recycling uses reverse osmosis (RO) membranes to produce freshwater but this process also generates a waste stream – the reverse osmosis concentrate (ROC) – which contains almost all the contaminants present in the original wastewater. The disposal of untreated ROC poses a health and environmental risk. This research used 18 samples of ROC to test various treatment combinations and concluded that coagulation with ferric chloride followed by filtration with biological activated carbon reduced dissolved organic carbon, phosphorus and nitrogen compounds, and disinfection by-products, to safe and acceptable levels.

In Australia, remote and regional communities frequently manage relatively small, isolated water treatment and waste management systems which have water quality and health risks characteristic of small-scale decentralised operations. Australian water utilities have a wealth of experience in addressing these issues, and this project gathered and documented a series of case studies from Victoria, Tasmania and the Northern Territory to form a knowledge base that can be referred to in the future.

The ADWG prioritises the removal of microscopic pathogens (and the toxins some produce) from public drinking water supplies to prevent large scale outbreaks of illness. This principle underlies the importance of adhering to consistently high standards of water treatment plant (WTP) operation and maintenance. This Guide refers primarily to the conventional WTP processes of chemical pre-treatment, coagulation, flocculation, clarification, filtration and disinfection; and establishes target criteria and critical limits for each step in the treatment process. The Guide is designed to provide water utility managers and operations staff with a concise reference document to optimising the WTP processes that produce microbially-safe drinking water and additionally supports the establishment of microbial Health-based targets.

Source waters are disinfected to remove harmful pathogens, but chlorine reacts with organic matter and bromides to form disinfection by-products (DBPs) which can affect health. Water treatment reduces DBPs to safe levels by using alum to remove organic matter before disinfection but some water sources, particularly those with high bromine levels, are still difficult to treat. This research aimed to compile the best protocols for alum coagulation and disinfection when source waters contain different levels of organic matter and bromides, and to relate these to health risks. When organic matter was removed with 125 mg/L alum, and this treated source water was disinfected twice, and the first dose was calculated to generate chlorine levels of 0.5 mg / L for two days before administering the second dose, then DBP levels in drinking water were minimised. Neither alum-treated nor disinfected water caused toxicity in two laboratory tests used to examine risks to health.

Components of dissolved organic matter (DOM) and dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) in source waters can react with disinfecting chlorine or chloramine to form nitrogenous disinfection byproducts (n-DBPs) which might be toxic and hazardous to health. In this research, water samples were collected from nine water treatment plants and found to contain 28 n-DBPs. Total n-DBP formation, and particularly brominated n-DBP formation, was affected more by the levels of bromine in raw water than the different forms of nitrogen, and this led to the recommendation that it could be beneficial to monitor raw waters with high bromine concentrations. Although chloramination caused formation of more n-DBPs than chlorination, coagulation treatment decreased total DBP levels. Further research was recommended to characterise the toxicity of n-DBPs and to optimise the removal of DOM, DON and other n-DBP precursors by using GAC Acticarb in the treatment train.

Cyanobacterial blooms in surface waters are a source of cells, taste and odour compounds, and a range of toxins. This research optimised treatment processes for the removal and control of cyanobacteria and their metabolites from a range of source waters. It was concluded that pre-chlorination is not advisable when cyanobacteria are present, but that in some situation’s potassium permanganate is a viable alternative. Although all three tested coagulants; ferric chloride, aluminium chlorohydrate and aluminium sulphate (alum) removed 90 to 95% of cells, alum at pH 6.3 was the most cost-effective. Maintaining pH > 6 reduced cell lysis and metabolite release. Since cyanobacteria in sludge remained viable for 2-3 weeks it was recommended that sludge detention in the clarifiers should be minimised.