Ultrafiltration membranes are used to remove viruses from treated wastewater. This makes it safe for release to the environment or for recycling, but it is important to monitor integrity of the membrane to ensure there are no damaged sections that viruses can break through. This research demonstrated that a silver nanoparticle is a valid, safer alternative to using non-infectious bacteriophage viruses that are currently used to test membrane integrity. The silver nanoparticle was tested and validated in a laboratory-scale ultrafiltration membrane unit. It was concluded that work should proceed to full-scale validation and integrity-testing of ultrafiltration membranes in recycled water applications.

Harmful pathogens and compounds must be removed from wastewater before it can be discharged to the environment or used for irrigation, and many source waters need salts removed to make them potable. Microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes remove pathogens and unwanted chemicals but as they are used, they become fouled and blocked by particulates and compounds from the water being filtered, as well as by the formation of biofilm, and by chemical interactions between solutes and the membrane materials. Although the membranes are cleaned regularly, the cleaning chemicals themselves can cause a problem. This research characterised the damage that various cleaning regimens inflict on membranes made of different materials and examined the effects of progressive and consecutive stages of membrane aging and degradation on performance. It was concluded that the type of cleaning agent affects the mechanism of membrane degradation and the severity of membrane integrity loss. More information is needed regarding the cleaning protocols and agents used in industry. Information from this research can inform a generally applicable model to predict membrane aging and decline in performance.

The Australian water industry uses a variety of membrane processes to remove unwanted pathogens or compounds, such as salt, from source waters. As membranes age their ability to fulfil these removal and filtering functions declines. The problem is that although there are recognised and validated tests for membrane integrity, they are usually performed only on new membranes, and information about the effect of membrane aging on pathogen removal is limited. This project reviewed published literature and identified four methods suitable for future development as Membrane Integrity Tests that may prove applicable to evaluate aging membranes during ongoing and long-term plant operation.

The ADWG 2011 lacked objective, quantifiable criteria for measuring pathogen removal from source waters. The WHO requires that health-based targets (HBTs) are used to ensure safe drinking water. HBTs can be set by making ‘Disability Adjusted Life Year’ (DALY) calculations which incorporate information about a population; the average Australian lifespan and the impact of infection on the length of a healthy life. Pathogen levels in water that correspond to micro-DALYs with minimal population-level effects are too low to be detectable by existing tests. This problem is addressed by calculating ‘log removal values’ (LRVs). Pathogens can be measured in source and treated water after the application of a defined method. When 90% of the pathogen is removed, the LRV equals 1, while 99% removal has an LRV of 2. HBTs incorporate LRVs, which are based on objective, quantifiable criteria, to reduce pathogen loads to levels that correspond to acceptable Australian micro-DALY levels. This research collated existing datasets about pathogens in source waters and the efficiency of their removal by treatment plants around Australia. From this, default pathogen levels for a range of Australian source waters and climate events, and LRVs for different treatment methodologies were obtained.

Pathogenic microscopic organisms in source waters pose a risk to public health if water treatment plants do not remove them. It was thought that sensitive PCR tests could be developed to inform decision-making about the most appropriate treatment processes, and to check the absence of pathogens from drinking water. This research focussed on four pathogen classes: cryptosporidium, microcystis, adenovirus and ammonia oxidising bacteria; and evaluated six DNA extraction kits. The Qiagen kit was most cost-effective for extracting DNA and Promega To-Taq polymerase was best for carrying out the PCR test on pathogens in real-world water samples. Other components of the PCR tests that were developed included test controls and DNA standards. A test for each class of pathogen was established and written as a ‘Standard Operating Protocol’ (SOP) which was then applied in different laboratories around Australia. Between-laboratory comparison of results showed the developed PCR tests to be highly reproducible and reliable. They can now be added to the existing suite of tools used to minimise risks to public health.