Raw source water contains parts of plants, blue-green algae and their toxins, and many other types of organic matter. Identifying the types and amounts of organic matter helps treatment plant operators make informed decisions about the most efficient and cost-effective methods for treating and removing unwanted substances from source waters. The problem is that many of the tests for identifying organic compounds can take hours to days to deliver results. This research developed a test that gives information immediately. It uses three commercially available fluorescent probes that each emit fluorescent light at a specific wavelength. Certain compounds within organic matter, such as proteins, “reflect” the fluorescent light, but at different wavelengths which can be detected by the probes. These patterns of “reflected” fluorescence were related to traditional tests for organic compounds. This on-line fluorescence monitoring was then trialled at real-world treatment plants. The patterns gave reliable information about broad categories of organic compounds and there was a linear correlation between dissolved organic carbon and fluorescent intensity in both raw and treated waters. This research has provided a valuable addition to the suite of tools available for producing safe, high quality drinking water.

The protection of sources of water and catchments is an important method for maintaining water quality; one that can mitigate cost and reliance on downstream water treatment and disinfection. Catchment protection requires risk assessment, but water quality management approaches were not originally developed for natural environments, and ecosystem-based methods (such as the Ecological Risk Assessment methodology), require complex data inputs often unavailable to water utilities.

This paper discusses various water quality risk management techniques and proposes a step-by-step catchment risk assessment methodology that is compatible with the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines.

Components of dissolved organic matter (DOM) and dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) in source waters can react with disinfecting chlorine or chloramine to form nitrogenous disinfection byproducts (n-DBPs) which might be toxic and hazardous to health. In this research, water samples were collected from nine water treatment plants and found to contain 28 n-DBPs. Total n-DBP formation, and particularly brominated n-DBP formation, was affected more by the levels of bromine in raw water than the different forms of nitrogen, and this led to the recommendation that it could be beneficial to monitor raw waters with high bromine concentrations. Although chloramination caused formation of more n-DBPs than chlorination, coagulation treatment decreased total DBP levels. Further research was recommended to characterise the toxicity of n-DBPs and to optimise the removal of DOM, DON and other n-DBP precursors by using GAC Acticarb in the treatment train.

Cyanobacterial blooms are a major problem for reservoir managers because of the large numbers of cells and the toxins they contain. These blue-green algae blooms have traditionally been treated with the algaecide copper sulphate, but this was expensive and unsustainable because it killed non-target species and left residual contaminants. This research examined and rejected alternatives: other copper-based algaecides, hydrogen peroxide, substances that trap cyanobacterial-growth supporting nutrients on the floor of the reservoir, and mechanical surface mixers. Laboratory experiments that tested the ability of ultrasound to prevent the photosynthetic cyanobacteria from floating at the depth that optimises light absorption were initially promising because the ultrasound reduced photosynthesis and metabolism and the blue-green algae died. Unfortunately, when an ultrasound system was deployed in a reservoir, the much larger volume of water attenuated and ‘absorbed’ the low-power ultrasound and led to the conclusion that sustainable, environmentally friendly levels of ultrasound do not provide effective control of blue-green algae. This rigorously conducted scientific study has generated useful information about methods which do not work, and resources can now be directed to promising new innovations.

Remote and regional Australian communities commonly produce potable water by removing salt from brackish groundwater. Existing desalination technologies, such as reverse osmosis (RO) have high electrical energy and technical requirements. Groundwaters often contain high levels of silica (quartz) which, together with the salts, form scale which blocks RO membrane and other components which are expensive to replace. This research examined an alternative desalination process: capacitive deionisation. Laboratory-scale experiments found that single-walled carbon nanotubes were the best material to use for electrodes, that membranes placed before the electrodes increased efficiency of salt removal and decreased energy usage, while silica, which lacks a charge that would bind it to either the positive or negative electrode, did not form scale deposits nor interfere with the desalination process. A full-scale version of this unit was tested onsite in the Northern Territory and described in WaterRA Project 1047.

Some remote and regional areas of Australia rely on groundwater. A problem with this is that naturally occurring salts, such as calcium carbonate, make the water ‘hard’ and cause scale deposition on the elements used to heat water. Scale also blocks taps and showerheads. This research examined different methods for predicting the amount of scale that a groundwater might form and also considered the pro’s and con’s of various treatment technologies which prevent scale formation. The consideration of community size and the chemical characteristics of different groundwaters was incorporated into this assessment and recommendation for scale prevention.

Water is disinfected to remove harmful microbes and pathogens such as cholera and typhoid. The problem is that disinfection of certain types of waters, such as those containing naturally high levels of bromide or iodide, can cause the formation of disinfection by-products (DBPs). Some DBPs have been linked to cancer although this association is relatively weak because many other factors have a much stronger influence on the development of cancer than drinking water. Nevertheless, the water industry aspires to minimise this risk and conducted this research to measure the levels of bromide, iodide and other substances in Australian source waters. A number of treatments with potential to remove bromide were examined, and it was found that chlorination reduced the risk posed by iodo-DPBs.